![]() |
The
Best American Science and Nature Writing 2001
by Edward O. Wilson Houghton Mifflin, 2001 |
|
|
| As a form of expression, science writing occupies a vulnerable middle ground between the technical scentific reports found in professional journals and the broad fictions of speculative literature. Scientists may view these writers as amateurs and the literary critics consider them journalists, but they provide a vital bridge between two branches of the same culture. | The Best American Science and Nature Writing 2002 | ||
| Nature writers work in a similar territory, though closer to the literary pole, according to Edward O. Wilson, who edited the 2001 edition of this annual anthology. "With roots going back to nineteenth-century romanticism, it cultivates the facts and theories of science but relies heavily on personal narrative and aesthetic expression," he explains. | The Best American Science and Nature Writing 2003 | ||
| The narratives of both science and nature writers not only help us understand the universe and our role in it, but they are also critical to our survival as individuals and as a species. | The Best American Science and Nature Writing 2004 | ||
| "Science, like the rest of culture, is based on the manufacture of narrative," writes Wilson. "That is entirely natural, and in a profound sense it is a Darwinian necessity. We all live by narrative, every day and every minute of our lives. Narrative is the human way of working through a chaotic and unforgiving world bent on reduciing our bodies to malodorous catabolic molecules. It delays the personal surrender of our atoms and compounds back to the environment for the assembly of more humans, and ants." | The Best American Science and Nature Writing 2005 | ||
|
Search our selection of new, used and out-of-print books. |
|
Hoagland on Nature: Essays | |
| As evidenced here, the best American science and nature writers of the year 2000 traveled widely and returned home with serious social and environmental issues to share. |